Towards Group Decision Making via Semantic Decision Tables and Blackboards
نویسندگان
چکیده
Information infrastructures become increasingly decentralized. In these environments, coming up with coherent collective decision systems is difficult, especially in environments where central “authorities” are lacking. In this paper, we explore the idea of using artifacts called Blackboards for Decision Tables to support collaborative and incremental evolution of a network of Semantic Decision Tables, which we expect can improve the stakeholders capabilities to make decisions at a local and a community level.
منابع مشابه
Decision-Making Styles and Attitude Towards Substances: Predictors of Potential Addiction in Adolescents
Objective: In all societies, adolescents are the most vulnerable age group to addiction. Decision-making styles and attitude toward substances can play an important role in the tendency of adolescents to addiction. The aim of the current study was to investigate the role of decision-making styles and attitude toward substances in predicting the potential addiction among adolescents. Methods: I...
متن کاملUsing SOIQ(D) to Formalize Semantics within a Semantic Decision Table
As an extension to decision tables, Semantic Decision Tables (SDTs) are considered as a powerful tool of modeling processes in various domains. An important motivation of consuming SDTs is to easily validate a decision table during the Validation and Verification (V&V) processes. An SDT contains a set of formal agreements called commitments. They are grounded on a domain ontology and considered...
متن کاملTowards Directly Applied Ontological Constraints in a Semantic Decision Table
Decision tables have been a powerful tool for business people since a long time ago. A semantic decision table (SDT) is a decision table properly annotated with domain ontologies. It contains a set of formal agreements called commitments, which is a result from group decision making processes involving a community of business stakeholders. In this paper, we focus on validation and verification ...
متن کاملSupplier selection with multi-criteria group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (case study on a project-based company)
Supplier selection can be considered as a complicated multi criteria decision-making problem.In this paper the problem of supplier selection is studied in the presence of conflicting evaluations and insufficient information about the criteria and different attitudes of decision makers towards the risk. Most of fuzzy approaches used in multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) are non-intuiti...
متن کاملInvestigating the relationship between career decision making and attitude towards marriage among college students
Introduction: Marriage is one of the most important decisions for every person. Various factors influence attitudes towards marriage. One of the factors that influences attitudes towards marriage may be career decision. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between career decision making and attitude towards marriage among students. Method: The present research is a descript...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013